I'm not questioning your professionalism or criticizing your work. This is simply a reflection on a discrepancy I’ve observed in the treatment of extensions. For example, an extension I developed with Co-Authors RMcGirr83, like "Moods," was approved immediately, despite containing minor errors that, although rightly pointed out, did not prevent its acceptance. Later, however, I received a private email from one of your team members, who stated bluntly that another of my extensions, which also contained what I believe to be minor, insignificant errors, did not meet the necessary requirements for approval. This difference in approach has led me to reflect.
And I say perhaps, I repeat perhaps, there is a yardstick conditioned by various elements that could come into play. Perhaps the state of mind? I'm joking.
Best regards
And I say perhaps, I repeat perhaps, there is a yardstick conditioned by various elements that could come into play. Perhaps the state of mind? I'm joking.

Best regards
Statistics: Posted by Galandas — Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:50 am